Skip to content

Part II. The Battlefield

Homer's Armies: I. Organisation · II. The Battlefield · III. Combat

Having examined how Homer's armies were organised, we can now turn to the landscape in which they fought. The Iliad places much of the fighting between the walls of Troy and the Achaean camp, established beside the sea around the ships drawn up on the beach. Between them stretched a plain crossed by rivers and dotted with low rises. This was more than a backdrop: it shaped the movements of the armies, their advances and retreats, and their use of chariots.

The archaeological site of Hisarlık, identified with ancient Troy, occupies elevated ground overlooking part of the surrounding plain. In the Iliad, the Trojans leave the city through its gates to fight and seek the protection of its walls when they retreat. Homer also mentions the rivers Scamander and Simoeis, as well as the hill of Batieia, geographical references that allow us to recognise certain features of the region (Iliad 2.811–815; 21).

The plain offered open ground for the movement of men and chariots, but we should not imagine it as entirely flat or uniform. Rivers, their banks and marshy areas could hinder movement. Moreover, the landscape described by Homer need not correspond exactly to that of the Bronze Age, several centuries before the poems were composed.

Interpretative reconstruction of the Trojan plain, with Troy, the Achaean camp, the Scamander, the Simoeis and the reconstructed wetlands.

Interpretative reconstruction of the Trojan plain. This illustration was created for El mundo de la Odisea. It is not based on an ancient map and does not claim to reconstruct the battlefield of the Trojan War with precision.

Its reference points include the location of Hisarlık, the identification of the Scamander with the modern Karamenderes and the Simoeis with the Dümrek, and palaeogeographical studies of the changing Trojan plain, including those discussed by Charles Brian Rose in The Archaeology of Greek and Roman Troy (Cambridge University Press, 2014). The extent of the former bay, the wetlands, the courses of the rivers and the position of the Achaean camp are illustrative approximations. The image combines elements of the region's historical geography with a hypothetical representation of the setting described by Homer.

Geomorphological studies by John C. Kraft, İlhan Kayan and Oğuz Erol show that the landscape around Troy underwent profound changes over the millennia. Sediment carried by the Scamander and Simoeis gradually filled part of the former marine inlet, altering the coastline, the river mouths and the extent of the wetlands. Much of the present-day plain occupies land that was once covered by shallow water or formed part of coastal and alluvial environments.

A photograph taken today from the ruins can therefore reveal the breadth of the plain and Hisarlık's elevated position, but not the landscape as it appeared during the Bronze Age. Nor can it establish where the Achaean camp and its ships were located: no site has been securely identified archaeologically as their position.

View from the hill of Hisarlık towards the plain of Troy and the sea.
View from the hill of Hisarlık (Troy) towards the plain and the sea. Photograph taken in 2006 from the archaeological site. Excavated remains appear in the foreground, with the broad plain separating Troy from the coast beyond. The modern landscape illustrates the settlement's elevated position, although the coastline and river courses have changed since the Bronze Age. Photograph: Bgabel, 2006. Wikimedia Commons. Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0.
Engraving of Hisarlık and the Trojan plain after the excavations of 1879.
Troy after the excavations of 1879. Engraving showing the hill of Hisarlık, the site of ancient Troy, viewed from a bridge over the former Scamander. The deep cuts made during Heinrich Schliemann's excavations stand out against the surrounding plain. According to the original description, the Simoeis valley lies to the left and the Scamander plain to the right; clouds on the left-hand horizon conceal Mount Ida. The illustration records the appearance of the site following the excavation campaigns carried out up to 1879. Source: Heinrich Schliemann, Ilios: The City and Country of the Trojans (1880), illustration no. 18. Public domain.

The geographical references in the Iliad have led some researchers to wonder whether Homer himself ever visited the region of Troy. The poem mentions the rivers Scamander and Simoeis, various elevations on the plain and other places that can be associated with features of the actual landscape.

In the nineteenth century, Heinrich Schliemann argued that Homer's knowledge of the Troad's topography and climate suggested that he had visited the region in person. He nevertheless believed that the poet could not have seen the great structures of ancient Troy, which had disappeared long before his time, and that his descriptions of them were drawn from tradition. More than a century later, the geologist John C. Kraft also suggested that the accuracy of certain geographical details might reflect direct observation of the terrain.

The poet could, however, have acquired this knowledge from travellers, local inhabitants or earlier epic traditions. We do not know whether Homer ever visited Troy. The correspondences between the poem and the region's geography suggest familiarity with the landscape, but they cannot establish that this knowledge came from personal experience.

The Iliad depicts Troy as a walled city whose gates opened onto the battlefield. Excavations at Hisarlık have shown that the Bronze Age settlement possessed substantial fortifications, although we cannot directly identify the structures uncovered by archaeologists with the places described by Homer.

Archaeologists have identified successive phases of occupation and rebuilding. Among the most significant are Troy VI and Troy VIIa, both dating to the Late Bronze Age and particularly relevant to the historical period commonly associated with the Trojan War.

The fortifications of Troy VI included massive stone walls with sloping outer faces, towers or bastions, and carefully constructed gateways. Some sections still stand several metres high. Mudbrick superstructures once rose above the stone walls, although little of these upper structures survives. These defences show that Troy was a substantial fortified settlement, with entrances connecting the citadel to the surrounding area.

Walls of Troy VI near the eastern gate of the citadel.
Walls of Troy VI, near the eastern gate of the citadel (Hisarlık, Türkiye). The photograph shows the approach to the fortifications, with the entrance visible in the background on the left. The surviving stone walls belong to the Bronze Age defences of Troy VI. Upper structures built from materials such as mudbrick once stood above them but have largely disappeared. Photograph: CherryX, September 2012. Wikimedia Commons. Licence: CC BY-SA 3.0.

Troy should not be imagined as a fortress confined to the citadel whose walls still stand at Hisarlık. Excavations have also revealed a lower settlement, particularly to the south of the citadel, although its extent and defensive organisation remain subjects of debate.

Sections of ditches cut into the bedrock have been discovered south of Troy VI. Manfred Korfmann and other researchers interpreted them as parts of a defensive system intended to protect the lower town and obstruct the approach of vehicles, including chariots. This interpretation has been challenged, however, and it has not been conclusively demonstrated that the excavated sections formed a continuous defensive enclosure.

In Homer's narrative, Trojan troops leave the city through its gates to fight on the plain and return through them when the battle turns against them. The Scaean Gates feature prominently in these movements. In Book 6, Hector meets Andromache there as he prepares to return to the battlefield (Iliad 6.392–394). Later, Priam orders the gates opened so that the Trojans fleeing Achilles can enter the city (Iliad 21.530–536). In Book 22, Hector remains outside the walls to face his enemy.

Excavations have identified monumental gateways in the fortifications of Troy VI, but none can be securely identified with the Scaean Gates described by Homer.

Engraving of the gate and walls of Troy during the excavations of 1873.
The gate and walls of Troy during the excavations of 1873. Engraving of the great trench excavated by Heinrich Schliemann at Hisarlık, viewed from the south-east. In the foreground are a paved road and the remains of a gate, a wall and a large tower. The engraving also identifies other structures, then interpreted as part of a ruler's residence or as remains from the Greek period. The Trojan plain and the Hellespont stretch into the distance; the original labels identify the islands of Samothrace and Imbros on the horizon. The illustration records the state of the excavations in June 1873. Schliemann's archaeological identifications reflect the interpretations of his time and do not establish a connection between this gate and Homer's Scaean Gates. Source: Heinrich Schliemann, Ilios: The City and Country of the Trojans (1880), illustration no. 10. Public domain.

Priam and the elders of Troy look out over the Achaean army from the city walls as Helen identifies some of its leading commanders (Iliad 3.146–242). This scene, known as the teichoscopy (‘viewing from the walls’), illustrates how the city's elevated position made it possible to survey the plain and recognise those on it. The location of Hisarlık helps us understand this advantage, although we cannot reconstruct the exact view described by Homer.

One of the most revealing tactical details in the Iliad comes from Andromache's words to Hector. Pleading with him to remain in the city, she advises him to station his men beside a wild fig tree, where the wall is easiest to scale.

Station the army by the wild fig tree, where the city is easiest to scale and the wall most vulnerable to attack.

Iliad 6.433–434.

Andromache explains that the Achaeans have already attempted to attack this section of the wall on three occasions. Among the attackers she names the two Ajaxes, Idomeneus, Agamemnon, Menelaus and Diomedes (Iliad 6.435–439). Her advice is therefore based not only on the terrain but also on experience gained from earlier assaults.

We do not know where the fig tree stood, nor can we associate it with any particular location among the ruins at Hisarlık. Nevertheless, the episode shows that even in a narrative centred on heroic deeds, Homer pays attention to vulnerable points in fortifications and the need to concentrate troops where an attack is likely.

A City That Did Not Fight Only Behind Its Walls

Sección titulada «A City That Did Not Fight Only Behind Its Walls»

The Iliad does not describe a continuous siege in which the Trojans remain confined behind their walls. Hector and his allies march out to fight on the plain, advance against the Achaeans and even assault the defences of their camp and attack their ships. The walls of Troy offer refuge when the battle turns against them, but the city is also defended in the open field.

At the opposite end of the plain, the Achaeans had established their own camp. Situated beside the sea to protect the ships and accommodate the warriors, it would eventually be enclosed by a wall and ditch that played a decisive role in the battles described by Homer.

Beside the sea, the Achaeans established their camp around the ships drawn up on the sand. Homer explains that the vessels were arranged in several rows, one behind another, because the beach, although extensive, did not provide enough space for them all. The ships occupied a broad stretch of coastline between two headlands (Iliad 14.30–36).

The camp consisted of more than ships. The warriors had shelters that Homer calls klisíai (‘huts’ or ‘barracks’), where they rested and kept their possessions. Achilles, for example, receives the envoys sent by Agamemnon in his shelter (Iliad 9.185–221). The poem also describes assemblies, meals, sacrifices and the division of booty, activities that suggest a military community established beside the sea for many years.

We do not know the camp's complete layout and cannot reconstruct the precise arrangement of its shelters and other spaces. Nor has any archaeological site been securely identified as the location of the Achaean ships.

In Book 7 of the Iliad, Nestor proposes building fortifications to protect the camp. The Achaeans construct a wall with towers and gates through which chariots can pass. In front of it, they dig a ditch and set pointed stakes (Iliad 7.336–441).

Homer describes a defensive structure incorporating stone, timber and earth. This is more than a simple palisade: the wall has entrances and raised defensive features, while the ditch presents an obstacle to attackers.

The importance of these defences becomes clear during the Trojan offensive in Book 12. Polydamas warns of the danger of crossing the ditch in chariots and advises Hector to have the warriors continue the attack on foot, leaving their horses in the care of the chariot drivers (Iliad 12.50–107). The fortifications thus force the attackers to change their manner of approach.

One detail deserves attention: these defences are built during the events narrated in the Iliad, when the war is approaching its end. The poem does not explain why the Achaeans had spent so many years without constructing comparable fortifications.

The Achaean defences did not prevent the Trojans from entering the camp. During the offensive in Book 12 of the Iliad, Hector lifts an enormous stone and hurls it against one of the gates, smashing its fastenings. The attackers surge through the breached entrance, and fighting continues inside the Achaean positions (Iliad 12.445–471).

The danger reaches its height towards the end of Book 15. Hector advances as far as the ships and manages to set fire to one of them (Iliad 15.704–746). The vessels that had brought the Achaeans to Troy and were meant to carry them home become the last things they have left to defend. Soon afterwards, Patroclus leads the Myrmidons into battle and forces the Trojans to retreat (Iliad 16.1–100; 16.257–291).

The camp was therefore far more than a place of accommodation. Its fortifications protected the ships, and their loss would have threatened both the survival of the expedition and the possibility of returning home.

The Iliad thus presents a battlefield in which Troy's elevated position, the walls of both sides, the rivers and the obstacles posed by the terrain all shaped the course of the fighting. Yet understanding the battlefield is not enough to explain how these men fought. For that, we must examine their weapons, their chariots and the ways in which they confronted their enemies.

Unless otherwise stated, translations of ancient texts are by the author.

Editorial version 2.9 · 3 November 2026